Investigating harassment takes more than a reporting channel.
iClex: end-to-end case management, with the confidentiality and rigor the subject demands.
A 30-minute consultative call. No commitment.
Every investigation, led by dedicated specialists
Occupational psychosocial risk management is now a legal requirement. Can your company prove it?
Regulatory updates in several jurisdictions have made the management of occupational psychosocial risk mandatory — and subject to inspection. Most whistleblowing channels treat an investigation as an isolated event, disconnected from the risk-management program.
A report with no trail
Spreadsheets and email don't survive a labor audit — there's no proof of who saw what, and when.
Investigation disconnected from risk management
Harassment and psychological-distress cases rarely turn into a mapped risk — yet that link is exactly what the new psychosocial-risk rules require.
A silent labor liability
Every poorly documented report is a potential lawsuit — the company's defense depends on what was actually recorded.
The report doesn't end at the investigation. It feeds your risk-management program.
No generic channel builds this bridge. ICLex turns a harassment or psychological-distress report into a mapped psychosocial risk — connected to the risk-management program required by current regulation, within the same case structured in Sections A–F.
Report received — channel with attached evidence, hashed the moment it's submitted.
Auditable investigation — every action logged with author, timestamp and restricted access scope.
Compliance report — risk mapped, routed to the risk-management program, ready for inspection.
See how every case is run
A real preview of the case screen — status filters, search and the progress of each investigation, exactly as your team will use it.
Track and manage every investigation in the organization.
| Case | Status |
|---|---|
Risco psicossocial — turno noturno CASE-2026-00231 | Reporting |
Assédio moral — coordenação regional CASE-2026-00229 | Evidence |
Conflito de interesse — fornecedor CASE-2026-00224 | Analysis |
Sobrecarga e adoecimento — equipe operacional CASE-2026-00219 | Remediation |
Uso indevido de verba de viagem CASE-2026-00201 | Closed |
Every step, logged — and verifiable.
This isn't a promise in copy. It's what happens, in the order it happens, with evidence hashed the moment it's submitted.
Report received
Category: moral harassment. Health compartment activated automatically.
Triage by an investigator with restricted scope
Access limited to the assigned investigator — general HR does not see the case.
Evidence attached
File copied and hashed at upload time, preserving chain of custody.
sha256 · a13f…9e2cRouted to the risk-management program
Psychosocial risk mapped and linked to the risk-management program.
Guided rollout, no complex integration.
Channel configured
Whistleblowing channel with your branding, categories and escalation flows.
Scoped investigation
Roles and departments define who can access each case — including sensitive ones.
Documented conclusion
Evidence, comments and decisions — all with an end-to-end audit trail.
Compliance generated
Risk report and the bridge to the risk-management program, ready for audit and inspection.
Mental health and harassment data are sensitive by law. We protect them with the rigor the law demands.
Granular access control
Custom roles and departments define exactly who sees each case — including per-investigator scope.
Health compartment
Mental-health and harassment cases are isolated from the general HR flow, with differentiated retention.
Privacy by design
Configurable retention, data minimization, and anonymity preserved to the extent the law allows.
Encryption and isolation
Data encrypted in transit and at rest, with multi-tenant isolation on every query.
Corporate integrity conducted with forensic rigor.
See the full cycle working with your own data
Confidentiality in the report. Rigor in the investigation. Security in the outcome.
Book a demoWhat compliance and legal teams ask first.
Anonymity is preserved to the extent the law allows: the reporter is not identified in the system, but cases with a legal identification requirement follow the applicable legal process — we don't promise what the law doesn't permit.